🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized professional network test recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."